Superpowers Symposium 2009


Chris Knowles provides an excellent summary of a symposium on "superpowers" I attended at Esalen Institute in Big Sur last week. I am used to attending scientific conferences, which are often heavy on details, data and statistics. By contrast, this meeting was heavy on the humanities and light on science, a challenging but very refreshing change for me.  My talk was entitled "Reality 3.3," in which I attempted to show how our models of common sense have evolved over time. I identified 3 major shifts in historical worldviews, and I speculated about a 4th (Reality 4.0) that is almost on the horizon.

The most startling part of the meeting for me was when Jacques Vallee spoke in detail about a UFO flap in Brazil. I hadn't realized the extent to which the Brazilian military was involved in studying that case, which persisted for three months, or the strength of the evidence, some of which is still classified.  

Comments

anonymous said…
"The most startling part of the meeting for me was when Jacques Vallee spoke in detail about a UFO flap in Brazil."

Some of us have started a new on-line forum for discussions on topics including parapsychology, psychical research, consciousness studies, Ufology and more.

The charter says the forum is for people who accept the validity of paranormal phenomena and want to disucss them without being distracted by debates on whether the phenomena are real or not.

A look at the members list will show some familiar names and some new ones, but the more people who join in the better. I hope many of you who are reading this will take a look at the forum and if you agree with the charter, will join us in the discussions.

The forum is located at:


http://psicology-forum.proboards.com/index.cgiThanks,
Monday, May 25, 2009
Anonymous said…
The second Jacques Vallee talk apparently included both von Bingen and Eckhart:

Jacques exploded commonly held myths about the Middle Ages and showed that there was a period of Enlightenment in the 11th and 12th Centuries that produced these masterpieces along with mystic visionaries like Hildegarde and Meister Eckhart.
I generally enjoy that kind of talk. I'll have to look for Vallee's books.
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
The Secret Sun said…
Jacques talked more generally about the Middle Ages- I was simply adding some color commentary on what this period produced, since Jacques' talk was primarily oriented towrds art and architecture. Check out the link to the Rushkoff piece as well.

Thanks for the link, Dean- and thanks for your presentation as well. I am in awe, as always.
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
Lawrence said…
Kind of strange you bumping into Vallee after that "heated" ufology thread here very recently, or maybe not, after all you would expect him to be there, at a conference at Esalen.

I've always been amazed at how Vallee achieved so much so very young, in several scientific disciplines. By the time he was thirty he had done so much in his own field of computer science (you know just doing work on ARPANET at SRI that laid the basis for much of the internet no biggie) and astronomy. Oh yeah and on the side had written by age thirty three landmark scientific books on ufology (Passport to Magonia was published when he was that age - 30 or 31 maybe - it still remains the classic watershed publication of genuine ufological science). Oh and he also helped to get the ball rolling with remote viewing experimentation at SRI about that time, or soon after, by the by.

By the time I was thirty, I had done what exactly? Hmm this is depressing, best not to compare myself to geniuses like Vallee or anybody really...
Wednesday, May 27, 2009
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Feeling the future meta-analysis

Before Cornell University psychologist Daryl Bem published an article on precognition in the prominent  Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, it had already (and ironically given the topic) evoked a response from the status quo. The New York Times  was kind enough to  prepare us to be outraged .  It was called " craziness, pure craziness" by life-long critic Ray Hyman. Within days the news media was announcing that it was all just a big mistake .  I wrote about the ensuing brouhaha  in this blog .  But the bottom line in science, and the key factor that trumps hysterical criticism, is whether the claimed effect can be repeated by independent investigators. If it can't then perhaps the original claim was mistaken or idiosyncratic. If it can, then the critics need to rethink their position. Now we have an answer to the question about replication. An article has been submitted to the Journal of Social and Personality Psychology  and is available here .  The key
Read more

Skeptic agrees that remote viewing is proven

Image
Excerpt from a January 2008 item in the UK's The Daily Mail newspaper: In 1995, the US Congress asked two independent scientists to assess whether the $20 million that the government had spent on psychic research had produced anything of value. And the conclusions proved to be somewhat unexpected. Professor Jessica Utts, a statistician from the University of California, discovered that remote viewers were correct 34 per cent of the time, a figure way beyond what chance guessing would allow. She says: "Using the standards applied to any other area of science, you have to conclude that certain psychic phenomena, such as remote viewing, have been well established. "The results are not due to chance or flaws in the experiments." Of course, this doesn't wash with sceptical scientists. Professor Richard Wiseman, a psychologist at the University of Hertfordshire, refuses to believe in remote viewing. He says: "I agree that by the standards of any other area
Read more

Show me the evidence

Image
Critics are fond of saying that there is no scientific evidence for psi. They wave their fist in the air and shout, "Show me the evidence!" Then they turn red and have a coughing fit. In less dramatic cases a student  might be genuinely curious and open-minded, but unsure where to begin to find reliable evidence about psi. Google knows all and sees all, but it doesn't know how to interpret or evaluate what it knows (at least not yet). In the past, my response to the "show me" challenge has been to give the titles of a few books to read, point to the bibliographies in those books, and advise the person to do their homework. I still think that this is the best approach for a beginner tackling a complex topic. But given the growing expectation that information on  virtually any topic ought to be available online within 60 seconds, traditional methods of scholarship are disappearing fast. So I've created a SHOW ME  page with downloadable articles on psi a
Read more