ESP Trainer by Russell Targ

See this page for information about Russell Targ’s ESP Trainer app for the iPhone.

As it says on Russell’s webpage,

In a year long NASA program with 145 subjects (under Contract 953653 NAS7-100) many were able to significantly improve their scores. Four of the subjects improved their scores at the hundred-to-one level or better. This approach has been used with surprising success on Wall Street. But of course, past results are no guarantee of future performance.

Because you are learning a new skill, slower is better than faster.

If you find yourself frequently scoring 12 or more, write to the developer: Contact Russell Targ

Comments

Sharon Day said…
That's interesting. I must admit that when I go on gotpsi, I usually look at when I pick the wrong card and see what I felt when I looked at the card that was correct. Then, next round, I can look for that feeling when looking at the cards. Each day, my skills change. Some days, it's the very fastest thing that comes to mind, pure instinct. Other days, it's patterns. I recognize the pattern from a previous time. Other times, it's color. Other times it's whichever card to me looks further away visually than the others--I'm very spatially oriented. By doing this frequently, I learn more about the feelings I get in my body when I'm in the right groove. I've learned a lot about how I get information and how I can manipulate information. Great brain exercises!
Friday, November 13, 2009
Potential Impulse said…
This effect seems huge. If this effect can be stabilized or can be maintained stable, it could very well act as a breakthrough factor large enough to bypass dogma. I find it very surprising to see effect sizes of this magnitude in this well know setup.Thank you for posting this; and please update your blog should further developments occur on this work.
Saturday, November 14, 2009
Potential Impulse said…
Sorry, I posted on the wrong topic - this was supposed to be on Rupert Sheldrakes telephone telepathy. :)
Sunday, November 15, 2009
Aaron said…
completed 10,000 trials and p=.024
Tuesday, December 29, 2009
TheCelinette said…
Hello (from France:)

I recently heard Russell Targ in a meeting about remote veiwing in Paris. So I get the ESP trainer's app on my Iphone.

How often do we use this app to get better ? Each day ? And how long ? 15 minutes per days ?

Can you give me informations ?

Thank's :)
Céline
Sunday, March 27, 2011
Dean Radin said…
> How often do we use this app to get better ? Each day ? And how long? 15 minutes per day?

As when learning any skill, as often as possible!
Sunday, March 27, 2011
TheCelinette said…
I discovered ESP trainer in a conference in Paris in 2011 were Russel Targ was invited by IRIS Intuition Consulting, in March 2011.

I listened to your conference with a lot of attention. And just after I download the Esp trainer.

After leaving a first comment in your blog several months ago, I trained my self with it. But couldn't find my owm method to have better result.

To day, I was trying to meditate about my own life, and then I decided to play to ESP trainer with this kind of consciousness (meditate attitude... I'm new about it).

And for the first time of my life I did my best score. I made print screen to see the evolution of my game :
- 8 trails / 7 corrects.
- 16 trails / 11 corrects.
- 19 trails / 12 corrects.
- 24 trails / 14 corrects.

It was so hard to keep the same state and to not panic. That why my score is not regular. I wanted to share this with you.

I really hope that one day I will work in intuition ;) Let's follow our dreams and continue to try again and again.

Best regards,
Céline.
Tuesday, August 28, 2012
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Skeptic agrees that remote viewing is proven

Image
Excerpt from a January 2008 item in the UK's The Daily Mail newspaper: In 1995, the US Congress asked two independent scientists to assess whether the $20 million that the government had spent on psychic research had produced anything of value. And the conclusions proved to be somewhat unexpected. Professor Jessica Utts, a statistician from the University of California, discovered that remote viewers were correct 34 per cent of the time, a figure way beyond what chance guessing would allow. She says: "Using the standards applied to any other area of science, you have to conclude that certain psychic phenomena, such as remote viewing, have been well established. "The results are not due to chance or flaws in the experiments." Of course, this doesn't wash with sceptical scientists. Professor Richard Wiseman, a psychologist at the University of Hertfordshire, refuses to believe in remote viewing. He says: "I agree that by the standards of any other area ...
Read more

Feeling the future meta-analysis

Before Cornell University psychologist Daryl Bem published an article on precognition in the prominent  Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, it had already (and ironically given the topic) evoked a response from the status quo. The New York Times  was kind enough to  prepare us to be outraged .  It was called " craziness, pure craziness" by life-long critic Ray Hyman. Within days the news media was announcing that it was all just a big mistake .  I wrote about the ensuing brouhaha  in this blog .  But the bottom line in science, and the key factor that trumps hysterical criticism, is whether the claimed effect can be repeated by independent investigators. If it can't then perhaps the original claim was mistaken or idiosyncratic. If it can, then the critics need to rethink their position. Now we have an answer to the question about replication. An article has been submitted to the Journal of Social and Personality Psycho...
Read more

Show me the evidence

Image
Critics are fond of saying that there is no scientific evidence for psi. They wave their fist in the air and shout, "Show me the evidence!" Then they turn red and have a coughing fit. In less dramatic cases a student  might be genuinely curious and open-minded, but unsure where to begin to find reliable evidence about psi. Google knows all and sees all, but it doesn't know how to interpret or evaluate what it knows (at least not yet). In the past, my response to the "show me" challenge has been to give the titles of a few books to read, point to the bibliographies in those books, and advise the person to do their homework. I still think that this is the best approach for a beginner tackling a complex topic. But given the growing expectation that information on  virtually any topic ought to be available online within 60 seconds, traditional methods of scholarship are disappearing fast. So I've created a SHOW ME  page with downloadable articles on psi a...
Read more