Levitation in Paris

I was in Paris the beginning of April, giving a talk at the Sorbonne for the launch of the French translation of my book, Supernormal. While walking about and enjoying the city on the way to the Arc De Triomphe, I passed a levitating man. This was a nice synchronicity given the topic of my book, which just won the 2014 Silver Naulitus Book Award. This is a major book award "for exceptional literary contributions to spiritual growth, conscious living, high-level wellness, green values, responsible leadership and positive social change as well as to the worlds of art, creativity and inspirational reading for children, teens and young adults." 


How is the man levitating? It's an impressive trick, even when you know how it works.



Comments

Gianfranco Bussalai said…
Really there is a trick? I was sure it was a real levitation phenomenon ... (just commenting as skeptics think a believer in ESP would answer)
Saturday, April 19, 2014
Topher Cooper said…
Just a minor point -- in the parlance of prestidigitation this is referred to as a "suspension." In a levitation there is no apparent contact with the ground. In a suspension there is but it does not appear to be adequate -- a casually held staff in this case, but two classic forms are an inverted broom being leaned against or a neck resting on the top of a chair back.
Saturday, April 19, 2014
Dean Radin said…
Thanks for the distinction Topher!
Sunday, April 20, 2014
Enfant Terrible said…
This is how it works: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTmg5jdKskE
see at 4min15s
Wednesday, April 23, 2014
Unknown said…
Out of curiosity, Dean. What are your opinions on Christof Koch and his IIT?
Monday, April 28, 2014
Unknown said…
Action-reaction forces at work involving the staff and his body functioning as one system.
Monday, May 05, 2014
Benjamin Steigmann said…
Eric Dingwall, noted skeptic (I would say that term actually applies to him, as opposed to others who claim the term), put forth strong evidence supporting the claimed levitations of the "thaumaturgist monk" Joseph of Cupertino, suggesting that the case was authentic, in a book I am currently reading, "Some Human Oddities".
Saturday, May 10, 2014
Unknown said…
Madame David Alexandra Neel (24 October 1868 – 8 September 1969) has given a firsthand account of levitating lamas that she saw travelling at great speeds in the inner reaches of the Himalayas. The books on Tantra state that levitation occurs when one of the 5 pranas (life forces) in the body called the uddaan prana gets activated and ascends from the feet to the head making the body as light as a feather. Madame David Neel was a close acquaintance of the Mother, the Jewish spiritual collaborator of Sri Aurobindo.
Monday, May 12, 2014
Unknown said…
Truth is stranger than fiction




While on the subject of levitation, 2 respected Indian scientists, Prof U R Rao (ex-chairman of the Indian Space Research Organization) and Dr S Shukla (ex-scientist, National Chemical Laboratory, Pune), are on record for saying that they experienced levitation and nuclear transmutation (alchemy) while on a visit to a remote Himalayan town where they were led to a cave by a guide that was inhabited by a yogi. They say that the yogi imparted a supraphysical power to them via a mantra that caused their bodies within minutes to levitate 4 feet above the ground and that on being given a piece of iron they were able to convert it into pure gold after chanting a certain mantra 108 times given to them by the same yogi. The gold bit was later tested in a lab and found to be 24 carat.
Monday, May 12, 2014
Vasilios Billy Mavreas said…
gotta say, dean, i like your outfit better.
Saturday, May 24, 2014
AAB said…
There was a guy using the same trick in my hometown a few months ago. It drew a small crowd and is admitadly quite ingenious, though easy enough to figure out. He's obviously sitting on a kind of chair (of sorts) that uses the pipe as an oversized chair leg and a supporting base under the carpet.
Tuesday, June 10, 2014
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Skeptic agrees that remote viewing is proven

Image
Excerpt from a January 2008 item in the UK's The Daily Mail newspaper: In 1995, the US Congress asked two independent scientists to assess whether the $20 million that the government had spent on psychic research had produced anything of value. And the conclusions proved to be somewhat unexpected. Professor Jessica Utts, a statistician from the University of California, discovered that remote viewers were correct 34 per cent of the time, a figure way beyond what chance guessing would allow. She says: "Using the standards applied to any other area of science, you have to conclude that certain psychic phenomena, such as remote viewing, have been well established. "The results are not due to chance or flaws in the experiments." Of course, this doesn't wash with sceptical scientists. Professor Richard Wiseman, a psychologist at the University of Hertfordshire, refuses to believe in remote viewing. He says: "I agree that by the standards of any other area ...
Read more

Feeling the future meta-analysis

Before Cornell University psychologist Daryl Bem published an article on precognition in the prominent  Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, it had already (and ironically given the topic) evoked a response from the status quo. The New York Times  was kind enough to  prepare us to be outraged .  It was called " craziness, pure craziness" by life-long critic Ray Hyman. Within days the news media was announcing that it was all just a big mistake .  I wrote about the ensuing brouhaha  in this blog .  But the bottom line in science, and the key factor that trumps hysterical criticism, is whether the claimed effect can be repeated by independent investigators. If it can't then perhaps the original claim was mistaken or idiosyncratic. If it can, then the critics need to rethink their position. Now we have an answer to the question about replication. An article has been submitted to the Journal of Social and Personality Psycho...
Read more

Show me the evidence

Image
Critics are fond of saying that there is no scientific evidence for psi. They wave their fist in the air and shout, "Show me the evidence!" Then they turn red and have a coughing fit. In less dramatic cases a student  might be genuinely curious and open-minded, but unsure where to begin to find reliable evidence about psi. Google knows all and sees all, but it doesn't know how to interpret or evaluate what it knows (at least not yet). In the past, my response to the "show me" challenge has been to give the titles of a few books to read, point to the bibliographies in those books, and advise the person to do their homework. I still think that this is the best approach for a beginner tackling a complex topic. But given the growing expectation that information on  virtually any topic ought to be available online within 60 seconds, traditional methods of scholarship are disappearing fast. So I've created a SHOW ME  page with downloadable articles on psi a...
Read more