Flash Mob Opera

This is not directly related to my interests in extended human capacities, but having been a concert violinist for many years I always appreciate new ways to popularize the experience of the classics (from La Traviata in this case to e.g., Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band). This video is one of the most delightful ways of popularizing classic opera that I've seen.


Comments

Paprika said…
Hi Dean, I'm wondering whether you're going to answer Keith Augustine's second question in the last thread.

Aside from that, when will your next book be out?
Sunday, July 11, 2010
A. Shadow said…
That is really neat, thank you for sharing that!
It's a great way to keep people interested in the classics, as well as exposing to the classics to people who haven't listened to it.
Sunday, July 11, 2010
butterfly said…
That was fun!
Monday, July 12, 2010
Tor said…
Must have been fun to be there when that happened :)
Friday, July 16, 2010
Unknown said…
Solve the riddle: 'This is not directly related to my interests in extended human capacities.'

Is this written as a parapsychologist or a Scientist.

Thanks.
Sunday, July 18, 2010
Dean Radin said…
> Is this written as a parapsychologist or a Scientist.

Solution to the riddle: It's a trick question. A parapsychologist IS a scientist.
Tuesday, July 20, 2010
Kathy Reed said…
I did something I rarely do -- clicked through some blogs and found this one. I loved your Flash Mob Opera!
Thursday, July 22, 2010
Christopher Orapello said…
Wish I have been there on this day. Thanks Dean for sharing this.
Saturday, December 04, 2010
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Feeling the future meta-analysis

Before Cornell University psychologist Daryl Bem published an article on precognition in the prominent  Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, it had already (and ironically given the topic) evoked a response from the status quo. The New York Times  was kind enough to  prepare us to be outraged .  It was called " craziness, pure craziness" by life-long critic Ray Hyman. Within days the news media was announcing that it was all just a big mistake .  I wrote about the ensuing brouhaha  in this blog .  But the bottom line in science, and the key factor that trumps hysterical criticism, is whether the claimed effect can be repeated by independent investigators. If it can't then perhaps the original claim was mistaken or idiosyncratic. If it can, then the critics need to rethink their position. Now we have an answer to the question about replication. An article has been submitted to the Journal of Social and Personality Psychology  and is available here .  The key
Read more

Skeptic agrees that remote viewing is proven

Image
Excerpt from a January 2008 item in the UK's The Daily Mail newspaper: In 1995, the US Congress asked two independent scientists to assess whether the $20 million that the government had spent on psychic research had produced anything of value. And the conclusions proved to be somewhat unexpected. Professor Jessica Utts, a statistician from the University of California, discovered that remote viewers were correct 34 per cent of the time, a figure way beyond what chance guessing would allow. She says: "Using the standards applied to any other area of science, you have to conclude that certain psychic phenomena, such as remote viewing, have been well established. "The results are not due to chance or flaws in the experiments." Of course, this doesn't wash with sceptical scientists. Professor Richard Wiseman, a psychologist at the University of Hertfordshire, refuses to believe in remote viewing. He says: "I agree that by the standards of any other area
Read more

Show me the evidence

Image
Critics are fond of saying that there is no scientific evidence for psi. They wave their fist in the air and shout, "Show me the evidence!" Then they turn red and have a coughing fit. In less dramatic cases a student  might be genuinely curious and open-minded, but unsure where to begin to find reliable evidence about psi. Google knows all and sees all, but it doesn't know how to interpret or evaluate what it knows (at least not yet). In the past, my response to the "show me" challenge has been to give the titles of a few books to read, point to the bibliographies in those books, and advise the person to do their homework. I still think that this is the best approach for a beginner tackling a complex topic. But given the growing expectation that information on  virtually any topic ought to be available online within 60 seconds, traditional methods of scholarship are disappearing fast. So I've created a SHOW ME  page with downloadable articles on psi a
Read more