Synchronicities redux

Here's a nice synchronicity that happened to me recently. I'll preface this by saying that while I study these experiences for a living, my daily life is as mundane as anyone else's, and I tend not to be permeated by wildly improbable psychic events. (Except in the lab sometimes.)

My wife and I tend to work on our PCs at night while watching TV. Most TV is so banal that it takes 1% of our attention to track a show. The other 99% is devoted to email and other PC-related work (and the dogs, and each other). Our PCs are setup in such a way that we can't see each other's screens.

So I'm scanning through dozens of emails, and I see one from a colleague who says he's updating a book he's written on deja vu, and he's calling it Deja Vu Revisited. I'm thinking that's a clever title when suddenly my wife says out loud, "I'm having the strongest deja vu." I laugh in amusement at this beautifully recursive moment. A synchronicity about a deja vu. My wife is delighted too.

I don't recall any previous time, under any circumstance, when my wife spontaneously reported a deja vu; nor does she recall one. Was this a mere coincidence? Sure didn't feel like it.

Comments

M.C. said…
Hmmmn.

I wrote you an email about Deja Vu this afternoon before reading this blog entry. I've just finished writing a brief examination of precognitive deja vu on my own blog. Yes I would say that there are a lot of coincidences going on about the subject of Deja Vu right now!
Monday, May 08, 2006
Sounds from the Past affecting the Future said…
Deja Vu: the experience of review of what we have written and unfolding the the play of reality. As the viewer in the audience, your spirit has through audition been selected to play the part of Dean Radin. Your the narator and step up to the Shakespearean stage to play the part with fullness of heart or soul. The picture of props is in your mind and your creation of characters is part of your creation of mind shared with others also in their own world of dreaming child reflected on the surface of its sphere sleeps. Bubbles drifting through space-the shared Indranet. kAt the end of this play your character played out is choosing it's death and after which the viewer realizes it has just seen the most beautiful play by none less than you. Though this experience you learn. At some deep level we are captured and imprisoned here by our own desires. Through evolution of Technology we are further captured as we give up our own abilities. There is a revolution to rise above this and regain our place in the heavens. Therein is the deeper meaning of Spirituality. The letting go of humanism to the demi-god state and beyond. --michael
Tuesday, May 09, 2006
Anonymous said…
Suppose you set up a website where people could enter a word or phrase whenever they felt it was important.

You could date-stamp the information and filter out any close repeats from the same IP - and bingo - you might have evidence of a global synchronicity!

David Bailey
Tuesday, May 09, 2006
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Feeling the future meta-analysis

Before Cornell University psychologist Daryl Bem published an article on precognition in the prominent  Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, it had already (and ironically given the topic) evoked a response from the status quo. The New York Times  was kind enough to  prepare us to be outraged .  It was called " craziness, pure craziness" by life-long critic Ray Hyman. Within days the news media was announcing that it was all just a big mistake .  I wrote about the ensuing brouhaha  in this blog .  But the bottom line in science, and the key factor that trumps hysterical criticism, is whether the claimed effect can be repeated by independent investigators. If it can't then perhaps the original claim was mistaken or idiosyncratic. If it can, then the critics need to rethink their position. Now we have an answer to the question about replication. An article has been submitted to the Journal of Social and Personality Psychology  and is available here .  The key
Read more

Skeptic agrees that remote viewing is proven

Image
Excerpt from a January 2008 item in the UK's The Daily Mail newspaper: In 1995, the US Congress asked two independent scientists to assess whether the $20 million that the government had spent on psychic research had produced anything of value. And the conclusions proved to be somewhat unexpected. Professor Jessica Utts, a statistician from the University of California, discovered that remote viewers were correct 34 per cent of the time, a figure way beyond what chance guessing would allow. She says: "Using the standards applied to any other area of science, you have to conclude that certain psychic phenomena, such as remote viewing, have been well established. "The results are not due to chance or flaws in the experiments." Of course, this doesn't wash with sceptical scientists. Professor Richard Wiseman, a psychologist at the University of Hertfordshire, refuses to believe in remote viewing. He says: "I agree that by the standards of any other area
Read more

Show me the evidence

Image
Critics are fond of saying that there is no scientific evidence for psi. They wave their fist in the air and shout, "Show me the evidence!" Then they turn red and have a coughing fit. In less dramatic cases a student  might be genuinely curious and open-minded, but unsure where to begin to find reliable evidence about psi. Google knows all and sees all, but it doesn't know how to interpret or evaluate what it knows (at least not yet). In the past, my response to the "show me" challenge has been to give the titles of a few books to read, point to the bibliographies in those books, and advise the person to do their homework. I still think that this is the best approach for a beginner tackling a complex topic. But given the growing expectation that information on  virtually any topic ought to be available online within 60 seconds, traditional methods of scholarship are disappearing fast. So I've created a SHOW ME  page with downloadable articles on psi a
Read more