Post Modern Times

I was interviewed by Daniel Pinchbeck for Post Modern Times, a "series of short animated films presenting new ideas about global consciousness and techniques for social and ecological transformation."

You can watch part of that interview in two videos at this link.

Comments

icee said…
Hi Dean Radin!

I would like to thank you for amazing work! You're work is revolutionary and simply amazing.

Thanks for all videos and I love your theory of stupidity. Its nice to see that the taboos are being lifted, even if its not yet happening on a grander level like in mainstream.

About the idea with hive-brain, that's true. I do call it planetary conscioussness, since from my view conscioussness is everything. The problem you speak of with money is only a problem for greedy people :). A world in love and peace don't need money cause money do no good when it is used to prevent progress and stop people from achievein' their dreams.

I have myself experienced one with the oneness (a couple of days ago actually) and have come to this experience through information and empirical research.

A very intresting thing was (before I profoundly understood the concept behind that we all are one) that happened to me was when I was surfing your site project involving psychic ability. I played the first game but just clicked my way through, and then with the moving tiles I did't get what he point of it was (it was late and I was tired, but found the site intresting without reading all about how it exactly worked). So I thought that the tiles where going to move in the same direction as the arrow was pointing. And it did, so I started to think what the point was when all that I could do was to move the tiles in the same direction as the arrow was pointing. Then all of a sudden after this thought the tile moved to another space in which the arrow didn't point.

"Of course!" I thought and realised that my mind was making the tiles move in the way that I thought they where going to move. After this profound understanding it wasn't as easy anymore, cause I was shaken in a positive way of how much I could influence something. I didn't test it anymore though, and have been getting alot of synchronisities that's been guiding me sub-consioussly. Which I understood when I profoundly understood that we all are one.

I have a question for you mr. Radin and it is if you know if there's any scientific reserach to this in Sweden? I would love to contribute if possible, since I've gone a strange way of coming to understand how the universe works, and why it works in such mysterious ways! I've based my understanding on information, and my conclusion is, we have forgotten what we are so we could experience what we are. Life's forever, what else could it be? :)

Thanks again for all your work! Its amazing and I can't wait for the next years to unfold! Amazing things will happen! :)

Best Regards from Sweden! And keep up the amazing good work! THANKS!
Sunday, July 06, 2008
David Bailey said…
The music accompanying those videos reminded me of the music at your psychic games website. I wonder if any serious work has been done in inducing altered states of consciousness purely by music.
Saturday, July 12, 2008
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Show me the evidence

Image
Critics are fond of saying that there is no scientific evidence for psi. They wave their fist in the air and shout, "Show me the evidence!" Then they turn red and have a coughing fit. In less dramatic cases a student  might be genuinely curious and open-minded, but unsure where to begin to find reliable evidence about psi. Google knows all and sees all, but it doesn't know how to interpret or evaluate what it knows (at least not yet). In the past, my response to the "show me" challenge has been to give the titles of a few books to read, point to the bibliographies in those books, and advise the person to do their homework. I still think that this is the best approach for a beginner tackling a complex topic. But given the growing expectation that information on  virtually any topic ought to be available online within 60 seconds, traditional methods of scholarship are disappearing fast. So I've created a SHOW ME  page with downloadable articles on psi a
Read more

Feeling the future meta-analysis

Before Cornell University psychologist Daryl Bem published an article on precognition in the prominent  Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, it had already (and ironically given the topic) evoked a response from the status quo. The New York Times  was kind enough to  prepare us to be outraged .  It was called " craziness, pure craziness" by life-long critic Ray Hyman. Within days the news media was announcing that it was all just a big mistake .  I wrote about the ensuing brouhaha  in this blog .  But the bottom line in science, and the key factor that trumps hysterical criticism, is whether the claimed effect can be repeated by independent investigators. If it can't then perhaps the original claim was mistaken or idiosyncratic. If it can, then the critics need to rethink their position. Now we have an answer to the question about replication. An article has been submitted to the Journal of Social and Personality Psychology  and is available here .  The key
Read more

Skeptic agrees that remote viewing is proven

Image
Excerpt from a January 2008 item in the UK's The Daily Mail newspaper: In 1995, the US Congress asked two independent scientists to assess whether the $20 million that the government had spent on psychic research had produced anything of value. And the conclusions proved to be somewhat unexpected. Professor Jessica Utts, a statistician from the University of California, discovered that remote viewers were correct 34 per cent of the time, a figure way beyond what chance guessing would allow. She says: "Using the standards applied to any other area of science, you have to conclude that certain psychic phenomena, such as remote viewing, have been well established. "The results are not due to chance or flaws in the experiments." Of course, this doesn't wash with sceptical scientists. Professor Richard Wiseman, a psychologist at the University of Hertfordshire, refuses to believe in remote viewing. He says: "I agree that by the standards of any other area
Read more